Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you can Individual Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place out of attachment when you look at the people mating. Overview of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Websites contradiction revisited. Record away from Personal Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A social tech one decreases societal wedding and you will mental well-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Fields, J. Yards. (2001). Count, time, and time of marriages and you will divorces. Most recent Society Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux https://getbride.org/da/guatemalanske-kvinder/, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data out-of closeness, interests, and you can commitment: Comparison brand new assumptions of your own triangular concept of love. Emotional Profile, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Perception greatest throughout the doing tough: Societal evaluations contained in this romantic dating. Record regarding Identification and you may Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit knowledge away from intimate competition. Record regarding Identification and you will Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to attractive solutions: This new progressed psychology regarding relationships repairs. Evolution and Person Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential research from disagreement and you may agreement inside troubled and you will nondistressed marital people. Journal off Consulting and you will Health-related Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A great., Environmentally friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the web: What is the large attraction? Diary out of Personal Issues, 58(1), 9–29.
Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-assessment objectives for the intimate matchmaking: A model of internationally enhancement and you can particular confirmation. For the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents about study of couple interaction (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge University Force.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-therapist bond from the lens away from connection principle. Psychotherapy: Idea, Browse, Routine, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The public keeping track of system: Improved sensitivity to social cues while the an adaptive reaction to personal difference. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest societal outcast: Ostracism, personal exemption, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Mindset Press.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Around the world and you will particular relational models regarding contact with social affairs. Diary regarding Character and you can Social Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can recommendations looking to within the intimate matchmaking. Identity and you can Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may particular connection representations for the adulthood: Will there be a love?. Record Out-of Personal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Close close relationships: Maintenance and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection in person impact certainly one of partners because a function of the new resemblance inside their mutual skills. Personality And you will Social Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience off extrinsic perks to your liking and loving. Diary out of Personality and Public Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
Cookie name | Active |
---|